[EDITOR'S NOTE: I have moved this post up to the top for a couple of days because it is highlighted on our letters page.]As many of you have seen, a Gill Foundation campaign for acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle has been launched throughout Colorado Springs
in the form of simple pictures of a dog mooing instead of barking. Banners have been hung downtown and this morning I saw a transit bus covered from bumper to bumper with the "Moo" picture.
Focus on the Family has countered with a "No Moo Lies" campaign that shows
the same dog barking. They say dogs are born barking and have to be trained to moo. I have to agree with Focus on the Family on that point. The "moo" campaign hurts itself in the fact that no dog comes out of its mother's womb moo-ing. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, let me know. This is also another sad instance of reducing humans to animals to make a point.
This also puts the City of Colorado Springs in a precarious situation. Will the city give equal access to things like city banners and buses for Focus on the Family? The Gill Foundation is spending nearly $1 million in the Springs because they say the city has a national reputation as being the most unfriendly toward homosexuals. Supporters of the campaign say this is merely to provoke discussion about the hot topic of whether someone is born gay or if homosexuality is conditioned by one's environment (and therefore something that can be changed). Has anyone seen any serious public discussion about this outside of the letters pages of newspapers?